Understanding How Age Was Calculated in Biblical Times (2024)

In order to understand how age was calculated in biblical times, it is important to explore the methods and beliefs surrounding age measurement during that period. The Bible provides us with insights into the long life-spans recorded for individuals in the Book of Genesis and beyond. There are debates as to whether these age calculations should be understood literally or figuratively, as well as theories suggesting that the names mentioned in genealogies represent clans or tribes rather than individuals.

Key Takeaways:

• Age calculations in biblical times were based on the recorded ages of individuals mentioned in the Bible.
• The Book of Genesis records long life-spans for individuals before and after the great Flood.
• There is a debate over whether these age calculations should be understood literally or figuratively.
• Some theories suggest that the names mentioned in genealogies represent clans or tribes rather than individuals.
• The cultural and historical context of biblical times influenced the methods of age calculation.

Age Calculation in the Book of Genesis

The Book of Genesis provides valuable insights into how age was calculated during biblical times, particularly through the long life-spans recorded for individuals such as Adam, Seth, and Methuselah. Before delving into the specific age calculations, it is important to note that the biblical calendar and measurement of time were different from our modern-day calendar. The biblical concept of a day began at sunset and lasted until the next sunset, and the week consisted of seven days, with the Sabbath being the named day.

In terms of age calculation, the Book of Genesis records remarkable longevity for individuals. For instance, Adam lived for nine hundred and thirty years before his death (Genesis 5:5). His son Seth lived for nine hundred and twelve years (Genesis 5:8), and Methuselah holds the record with nine hundred and sixty-nine years of life (Genesis 5:27). These extraordinary life-spans are consistent throughout the genealogies in Genesis 5, leading to an average age of nine hundred and twelve for the individuals listed.

After the Great Flood, the Bible continues to mention individuals living for extended periods of time. Abraham, for example, lived for one hundred and seventy-five years (Genesis 25:7), Isaac for one hundred and eighty years (Genesis 35:28), Jacob for one hundred and forty-seven years (Genesis 47:28), Joseph for one hundred and ten years (Genesis 50:26), and Moses for one hundred and twenty years (Deuteronomy 34:7). The question arises whether these ages should be understood literally or figuratively.

There are some who have attempted to make these ages only figurative. There are those who have attempted to explain the extended lengths in which people lived before the Flood in a non-literal sense.

Among the alternative explanations, one theory suggests that the names mentioned in the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 represent clans or tribes rather than individuals. According to this view, the years listed in the genealogies denote the duration of rule by a particular clan. For example, the Adam clan is said to have ruled for one hundred and thirty years until a person was born who eventually ruled the Seth clan. This pattern continued with subsequent clans or tribes taking over the rule for lengthy periods of time. Some proponents of this theory argue that there may have been significant gaps between the completion of one clan’s rule and the beginning of the rule of the next clan.

Biblical Support

The idea that the names in the genealogies represent clans instead of individuals finds some potential support from the Bible itself. In the Book of Judges, for instance, the names of Judah and Simeon are used to represent tribal units rather than individuals (Judges 1:3). This context suggests that a similar concept may apply to the genealogies in Genesis. However, it is important to note that while certain names in the genealogies are indeed identified as individuals, such as Adam, Seth, Enoch, Lamech, Noah, Shem, and Abraham, the burden of proof rests on those who propose that the other names represent clans or tribes.

Furthermore, the text in Genesis reads as a personal history of individuals. It not only mentions the particular son in the line but also states that sons and daughters were born to that son, implying individual family relationships. Additionally, the age of the father is given when he produces the particular son named, further reinforcing the interpretation of individual ages rather than clan durations.

While some argue for a non-literal interpretation of age calculations in the Bible, the historic view has been that early humans did live for extended periods of time. The New Testament treats the genealogies from Adam to Noah as a lineage of literal people, and every biblical example where the age of an individual is recorded is written as history. Furthermore, other ancient cultures also contain accounts of longevity among their people, providing additional support for the traditional understanding of age calculation in biblical times.

It is important to consider the cultural and historical context that shaped age calculation methods in biblical times. While there is ongoing debate and various theories, the prevailing view is that the ages mentioned in the Bible are to be understood literally. The biblical calendar and measurement of time were different from our modern-day system, and the long life-spans recorded in the genealogies emphasize the unique historical context of the biblical era.

Age Calculation Before and After the Flood

The age calculations before and after the Flood offer an intriguing contrast, with individuals living for hundreds of years before the event and gradually shorter life-spans after. In the Book of Genesis, we are provided with the ages of people who lived after Adam and Eve. Adam, for example, lived for 930 years, Seth for 912 years, and Methuselah for a staggering 969 years (Genesis 5:5, 8, 27). These long life-spans are also recorded for other individuals before the Flood, such as Enosh (905 years), Cainan (910 years), Mahalaleel (895 years), and Jared (962 years). The average age of those listed in Genesis 5 is 912 years.

After the Flood, the Bible still mentions people living for a significant period of time, although the ages begin to diminish. For instance, Abraham lived for 175 years (Genesis 25:7), Isaac for 180 years (Genesis 35:28), Jacob for 147 years (Genesis 47:28), Joseph for 110 years (Genesis 50:26), and Moses for 120 years (Deuteronomy 34:7). The question then arises: should these ages be understood literally?

Some scholars propose non-literal interpretations of these long ages. One alternative explanation suggests that the great ages recorded in the Bible are either ages of clans or based on different means of calculating years. According to this theory, the names listed in the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 represent clans or tribes rather than individuals. It is argued that certain names belong to individuals, but the references primarily pertain to clans or tribes. For example, the Adam clan is said to have ruled for 130 years until a person was born who eventually ruled the Seth clan. The Adam tribe continued to rule for another 800 years until the Seth clan began its 912-year rule. Some believe there may have been lengthy gaps of time between the completion of one clan’s rule and the beginning of the next clan’s rule.

However, there are several problems with the dynastic view theory. Firstly, certain names mentioned in the genealogies are clearly individuals, such as Adam, Seth, Enoch, Lamech, Noah, Shem, and Abraham. If these names represent individuals, why should the other names refer to clans or tribes? Secondly, the text in Genesis reads as a personal history of individuals, explicitly mentioning sons and daughters being born to the named individuals. Furthermore, the age of the father is given when he produces the particular son who is named, which seems to contradict the tribal concept. Additionally, the fact that some names in the genealogy do not have personal histories mentioned, such as Enosh, Cainan, and Mahalaleel, should not be taken as proof that they were clans rather than individuals. Overall, the theory that the names represent tribes, dynasties, or clans rather than individuals lacks substantial support.

Another explanation suggests that the high ages are due to a different method of calculating years. Some argue that the ages were given in lunar months rather than solar years. However, this interpretation leads to nonsensical results. For instance, Adam would have fathered Seth at the age of eleven, and Enoch would have only been five when he fathered Methuselah.

Therefore, the historic view that early humans lived for long periods of time can be maintained. The natural way of reading the text in Genesis 5 is that each name mentioned belonged to an individual who fathered a son, who in turn, fathered a son. There is no convincing evidence in the New Testament or other biblical genealogies to suggest that these records are anything but historical facts. Moreover, the belief in long life-spans of the patriarchs has been held for thousands of years, and other ancient cultures also recorded examples of longevity among their people.

While the debate over the literal interpretation of age calculations in the Bible continues, it is clear that the text presents these ages as real and historical. Understanding the cultural and historical context of age calculation methods in biblical times can provide further insights into the fascinating topic of how age was calculated in biblical times.

The Debate over Literal Interpretation

Scholars and theologians have long debated the literal interpretation of the age calculations found in the Bible, raising questions about the actual ages of individuals in biblical times. Some have argued that these ages are to be understood figuratively, while others maintain that they should be taken literally. Let’s explore the arguments surrounding this debate.

The Clans or Tribes View

One alternative explanation is that the ages mentioned in the genealogies of Genesis represent clans or tribes rather than individuals. According to this view, the names listed in the genealogies refer to ruling dynasties, with each name representing a period of time during which a particular clan or tribe held power. For example, the Adam clan is said to have ruled for 130 years before being succeeded by the Seth clan.

Supporters of this view suggest that there may have been significant gaps of time between the rule of one clan and the beginning of the rule of the next clan, which could explain the long ages mentioned in the Bible. However, critics argue that there is no clear evidence within the text to support this interpretation. Moreover, certain names mentioned in the genealogies, such as Adam, Seth, and Abraham, are specifically identified as individuals, casting doubt on the idea that all other names represent clans or tribes.

The Literal Interpretation

On the other hand, proponents of the literal interpretation argue that the ages mentioned in the Bible should be understood as actual lifespans of individuals. They point to various passages in the New Testament and the Book of Genesis that treat the genealogies as historical records. For example, Luke’s genealogy of Jesus in the Gospel treats each name as a literal person, connecting them through direct lineage.

Additionally, the belief in the long lifespans of the biblical patriarchs has been held for thousands of years and is supported by other ancient cultures that mention longevity among their people. Critics of the literal interpretation raise questions about the feasibility of such long lifespans, but supporters argue that the Bible describes a pre-Flood world that was fundamentally different from the world we know today.

Problems with the Dynastic View

While the dynastic view offers an alternative explanation for the long ages mentioned in the Bible, it faces several challenges. One major issue is the presence of certain names in the genealogies that are clearly identified as individuals, such as Adam, Seth, and Abraham. Furthermore, the text describes the personal history of some individuals, including the mention of sons and daughters being born to them.

The age of the father is also provided when a particular son is mentioned, which seems incompatible with the idea of dynastic rule. Critics argue that these factors strongly suggest that the names in the genealogies represent individuals rather than clans or tribes.

In conclusion, the debate over the literal interpretation of age calculations in the Bible continues among scholars and theologians. While some argue for a figurative understanding or alternative explanations based on dynasties, the belief in the literal ages of individuals is supported by biblical references, historical tradition, and the consistency of the biblical narrative. Ultimately, the interpretation of these age calculations remains a matter of personal belief and theological perspective.

The Clans or Tribes View

Some scholars propose that the names listed in the genealogies of Genesis actually refer to clans or tribes, rather than individuals, which could explain the extended ages recorded. According to this view, the names mentioned in the genealogies represent dynasties or ruling families rather than individual people.

For example, it is suggested that the Adam clan ruled for 130 years until a person was born who eventually ruled the Seth clan. The Adam tribe continued to rule for another 800 years until the Seth clan, the next clan listed, began its 912-year rule. This theory implies that there may have been lengthy gaps of time between the completion of one clan’s rule and the beginning of the rule of the next clan.

Supporters of the clans or tribes view point to the fact that the Bible does sometimes speak of a group of people by the name of an individual. In the Book of Judges, for instance, Judah and Simeon are mentioned as individuals but clearly represent tribal units. Therefore, it is argued, the names listed in the genealogical records of Genesis may also represent dynasties or tribes rather than individual persons.

However, there are several arguments against this view. Firstly, certain names mentioned in the genealogies, such as Adam, Seth, Enoch, Lamech, Noah, Shem, and Abraham, are specifically singled out as individuals. If these names are understood to refer to individuals, then why should the other names be interpreted as clans or tribes?

Secondly, the text itself reads like a personal history of individuals. It not only mentions the particular son in the line, but it also states that sons and daughters were born to that son. This personal history aspect seems to contradict the idea that the names refer to clans or tribes.

Furthermore, the ages of the fathers are given when they produce the particular son that is named. This fact seems to eliminate the tribal concept and reinforces the idea that the ages recorded are meant to be understood as literal ages of individuals.

Problems With the Dynastic View

While the clans or tribes view has been proposed as an alternative explanation for the extended ages recorded in the genealogies of Genesis, it faces several problems and criticisms.

1. Names of Individuals: It is important to note that certain names mentioned in the genealogy do belong to individuals, such as Adam, Seth, Enoch, Lamech, Noah, Shem, and Abraham. The burden of proof lies on those who argue that the other names refer to clans or tribes.
2. Cain and Abel Were Individuals: Cain and Abel, the first two sons of Eve, were obviously individuals. Seth, on the other hand, is supposed to represent a dynasty that was to arise in the future. However, the clear sense of the passage is that Seth was a third son of Adam and Eve, no different from Cain and Abel.
3. Reads as History: The text reads as a personal history of individuals, not as a record of dynasties or tribes. It mentions not only the particular son in the line but also states that sons and daughters were born to that son.
4. Ages Given: The ages of the fathers are given when they produce the particular son that is named. This fact seems to contradict the idea that the names refer to clans or tribes.

Therefore, while the clans or tribes view has been proposed as an alternative explanation, it lacks sufficient support and faces significant challenges in explaining the genealogical records of Genesis.

Problems with the Dynastic View

While the dynastic view offers an alternative perspective, it faces numerous challenges, including the fact that certain names in the genealogies are clearly attributed to individuals. This raises doubts about the claim that these names represent clans or tribes rather than individuals.

1. Names of Individuals

   To begin with, the genealogies in Genesis specifically mention certain names, such as Adam, Seth, Enoch, Lamech, Noah, Shem, and Abraham, as individuals. If these names refer to individuals, then why should we believe that the other names represent clans or tribes? Those who argue for the dynastic view have the burden of proof to demonstrate their claim.

2. Cain and Abel were Individuals

   Cain and Abel, the first two sons of Eve, were clearly individuals. The text also presents Seth as a son of Adam and Eve, with no indication that he represents a future dynasty. The natural reading of the passage suggests that Seth was an individual, just like Cain and Abel.

3. Reads as History

   The genealogies in Genesis read as a personal history of individuals. Not only do they mention the particular son in the line, but they also state that sons and daughters were born to that son. This narrative structure suggests a focus on individuals rather than clans or tribes.

4. Ages Given

   Furthermore, the age of the father is given when he produces the particular son who is named. This fact alone contradicts the notion that the genealogies represent tribal units. If the names in the genealogies were meant to signify dynasties, it would be unnecessary to provide the ages of the fathers when they fathered their sons.

While some proponents of the dynastic view suggest that the names in the genealogies could represent clans or tribes, the lack of substantial evidence and the presence of contrary indications make this interpretation less tenable.

Problems with the Dynastic View

There are, however, many problems with arguing that the names in the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 represent clans or dynasties rather than individuals.

1. Names of Individuals

   To begin with, we know that certain of the names mentioned in the genealogy do belong to individuals. Adam, Seth, Enoch, Lamech, Noah, Shem, and Abraham are specifically singled out as individuals. If these names represent individuals, then why should we believe the other names refer to clans or tribes? Those who consider the other names to refer to dynasties have the burden of proof on them.

2. Cain And Abel Were Individuals

   Cain and Abel, the first two sons of Eve, were obviously individuals. Seth, on the other hand, is supposed to represent some dynasty that was to arise in the future. The obvious sense of the passage is that Seth was a third son of Adam and Eve-no different from Cain and Abel.

3. Reads As History

   The text reads as a personal history of individuals. It not only mentions the particular son in the line, it also says that sons and daughters were born to that son.

4. Ages Given

   Furthermore, the age of the father is given when he produces the particular son that is named. This fact alone seems to eliminate the tribal concept.

The fact that nothing is mentioned with regard to the personal history of some of the names in the genealogy (e.g. Enosh, Cainan, Mahalaleel) should not be taken to prove they were clans rather than individuals.

Therefore, the view that the names represent tribes, dynasties or clans rather than individuals does not have much support.

The Literal Interpretation

The historic view, maintaining that individuals in biblical times lived for long periods, can be supported by analyzing the biblical text and its references to ages. The Bible provides specific ages for individuals such as Adam, Seth, Enoch, Lamech, Noah, Shem, and Abraham. These names are clearly identified as individuals, raising questions about whether other names in the genealogies represent clans or tribes rather than individuals.

While some argue that the names in the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 represent dynasties or tribes, there is limited support for this view. The Bible often refers to groups of people by the name of an individual, but in such cases, they clearly represent tribal units. The context and structure of the genealogies suggest a personal history of individuals, with the age of the father given when he produces a particular son. The absence of personal history for certain names does not prove they were clans rather than individuals.

Furthermore, the genealogies recorded in Scripture are consistently presented as historical facts. The New Testament treats the line of people from Adam to Noah as literal individuals. Luke, in particular, treats the genealogy as historical and provides no convincing evidence to suggest otherwise.

It is worth noting that the belief in the longevity of the Patriarchs has been held for thousands of years. Only in recent times have these ages been challenged. Other ancient cultures, too, have accounts of long lifespans among their people. This adds further support to the view that the biblical ages should be understood literally.

Eliminate Long Ages

The dynastic view, which suggests that the names in the genealogies represent clans or tribes, would eliminate the need to explain the long ages of people before and after the Flood. It would also push the dating of the creation of man further back in time, aligning it more closely with modern scientific views. However, there are several problems with this view.

1. Names Of Individuals: Certain names in the genealogies, such as Adam, Seth, and Noah, are unquestionably individuals. If these names represent individuals, then why should we believe the other names refer to clans or tribes?
2. Cain And Abel Were Individuals: Cain and Abel, the first two sons of Eve, are clearly portrayed as individuals. Seth, too, is presented as an individual, not as a representative of a future dynasty.
3. Reads As History: The biblical text reads as a personal history of individuals, mentioning sons and daughters born to particular individuals.
4. Ages Given: The ages of the fathers are given when they produce the named sons, which suggests a personal rather than tribal concept.

Overall, the evidence supporting the literal interpretation of age calculations in the Bible is stronger than the alternative views. The biblical text, its historical treatment, and the longstanding belief in the longevity of the Patriarchs all contribute to the argument for taking the ages in the Bible literally.

The Biblical and Astronomical Calendar

The way time was measured in the Bible is closely tied to the biblical and astronomical calendar, with a unique understanding of days, weeks, months, and years. In Genesis 1:2, God established the definition of a day, beginning at sunset and going to the next sunset. This is different from our modern concept of a day starting at midnight. The only day specifically named in the Bible is the Sabbath, which is considered a holy day for God’s people.

The biblical week is defined as containing seven days, with six days designated for work and one day for rest and remembrance, as stated in Exodus 20:11. The week begins with the Sabbath and is counted from there. The order of the other days of the week is named in relation to the Sabbath:

Similarly, biblical months are numbered with occasional mentions of names. When God brought the children of Israel out of Egypt, He reset their calendar to begin in the springtime, specifically in the month of Nisan (Exodus 12:2). To keep the calendar aligned with the proper season, a month is added to the calendar seven times in every 19 years. In leap years, the month of Adar covers two months, Adar 1 and Adar 2, while in normal years, there is only one month of Adar.

It is interesting to note that the final names for the twelve months on the biblical calendar came from Babylonian names acquired during the Babylonian captivity of the children of Israel. The biblical calendar months correspond to the Gregorian calendar months as follows:

January = Tevet and Shevat

February = Shevat and Adar

March = Adar and Nisan

April = Nisan and Iyar

May = Iyar and Sivan

June = Sivan and Tammuz

July = Tammuz and Av

August = Av and Elul

September = Elul and Tishrei

October = Tishrei and Cheshvan

November = Cheshvan and Kislev

December = Kislev and Tevet

Years in the Bible are not numbered but listed with regard to the ages of men, reigns of kings, or in relation to specific events. The religious year begins with the month of Nissan in the spring, while the civil year begins with the month of Tishrei in the fall. The biblical and astronomical calendar provides a unique perspective on time measurement during biblical times, reflecting the cultural and historical context of age calculation in ancient times.

Understanding the cultural and historical context of biblical times is crucial for comprehending the significance and methodology behind age calculations. Ancient age calculation methods differed from modern systems, and it is important to consider these differences when interpreting the ages recorded in the Bible.

One theory proposes that the names mentioned in the genealogies of Genesis represent clans or tribes rather than individuals. According to this view, the ages recorded in the Bible are not meant to be understood as literal lifespans of individuals, but rather as the lengths of time that these clans or tribes held power or ruled. This theory suggests that there may have been significant gaps of time between the rule of one clan or tribe and the next, which would explain the long periods of time recorded in the genealogies.

However, there are several problems with the dynastic view theory. While some names in the genealogies may indeed refer to clans or tribes, there is clear biblical evidence that certain names belong to individuals. The text also reads as a personal history of individuals, with specific ages given for the fathers when they produced their named sons. Additionally, there is no mention of the personal history or rule of some names in the genealogies, which should not be taken as evidence that they represent clans rather than individuals.

Another proposed explanation for the long ages recorded in the Bible is a different method of calculating years. Some have suggested that the ages were given in lunar months rather than solar years. However, this theory leads to nonsensical results, such as Methuselah fathering a child at the age of five. Thus, the literal interpretation of the ages recorded in the Bible remains the most plausible.

The Bible itself provides support for the literal interpretation of age calculations. Simon Peter, in his second letter, refers to the world before the Flood, indicating that there was a difference in the way time was experienced. Furthermore, the New Testament treats the genealogies from Adam to Noah as a literal record of individuals, and there is no evidence to suggest that these genealogies are anything other than historical facts.

It should be noted that the belief in long lifespans among the Patriarchs has been held for thousands of years and is consistent with other ancient accounts of longevity among their people. While it may be tempting to try and explain these long ages in the Bible through alternative interpretations, the most logical and historically supported view is that these ages are to be taken literally.

In conclusion, understanding the cultural and historical context of biblical times is essential for comprehending the age calculations recorded in the Bible. While alternative theories exist, the evidence strongly supports a literal interpretation of these ages. The ancient age calculation methods and the long lifespans recorded in the Bible provide unique insights into the beliefs and experiences of people during that time period.

Exploring age calculation in biblical times offers a fascinating glimpse into the ancient methods and beliefs regarding age measurement, highlighting the significance of biblical chronology.

The Book of Genesis provides a wealth of information on age calculation in biblical times. It records long life-spans for many individuals, such as Adam who lived for 930 years, Seth for 912 years, and Methuselah for a remarkable 969 years (Genesis 5:5, 8, 27). These age calculations are consistent throughout the genealogies mentioned in Genesis 5, with an average age of 912 for the individuals listed.

Before the great Flood, the Bible describes people living for hundreds of years. Enosh lived for 905 years, Cainan for 910 years, Mahalaleel for 895 years, and Jared for 962 years (Genesis 5). Although the ages decrease after the Flood, individuals such as Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, and Moses still lived for a significant period of time, with their ages mentioned in the Bible (Genesis 25:7, 35:28, 47:28, 50:26, Deuteronomy 34:7).

The debate over whether these age calculations should be understood literally or figuratively remains. Some argue that the long ages were only figurative, suggesting alternative explanations such as the ages representing clans or tribes rather than individuals. They propose that certain names mentioned in the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 represent dynasties or tribes instead of individual persons.

However, there are several problems with the dynastic view theory. While it is true that the Bible sometimes refers to groups of people by the name of an individual, there is clear evidence that certain names listed in the genealogies, such as Adam, Seth, Enoch, Lamech, Noah, Shem, and Abraham, represent individuals. Additionally, the text in Genesis reads as a personal history of individuals, providing details about the sons and daughters born to each individual in the genealogy.

Another argument suggests that the long ages were a result of a different method of calculating years, using lunar months instead of solar years. However, this theory does not hold up when applied to the ages mentioned in the Bible, as it would result in absurd calculations, such as Adam fathering Seth at the age of eleven.

The historic view, which maintains that the early humans lived for long periods of time, can be supported by the natural reading of the text in Genesis. The ages of individuals recorded in the Bible are treated as historical facts, and there is no convincing evidence to suggest otherwise. Other ancient cultures also contained examples of longevity among their people, further supporting the belief in the long ages recorded in the Bible.

It is important to consider the cultural and historical context that shaped age calculation methods in biblical times. The biblical calendar, for example, defined a day as beginning at sunset and ending at the next sunset. The week was set at seven days, with six days for work and one day for rest – the Sabbath. The biblical months were numbered and occasionally named, with a leap month added every 19 years to keep the calendar aligned with the seasons.

In conclusion, exploring age calculation in biblical times provides insights into the ancient methods and beliefs regarding age measurement. The age calculations mentioned in the Bible, while debated, are often understood as literal and represent the long life-spans believed to have been experienced by individuals in biblical times. Understanding the cultural and historical context is crucial in interpreting these age calculations and appreciating their significance in biblical chronology.

FAQ

Q: How was age calculated in biblical times?
A: Age was calculated differently in biblical times compared to modern times. It was based on genealogies and recorded in years.

Q: What is the age calculation in the Book of Genesis?
A: In the Book of Genesis, long life-spans are recorded for individuals. For example, Adam lived for 930 years, Seth lived for 912 years, and Methuselah lived for 969 years.

Q: How did age calculation change before and after the Flood?
A: Age calculations in the Bible show that people lived for shorter periods after the Flood compared to before. However, they still lived for a long time. For example, Abraham lived for 175 years and Moses lived for 120 years.

Q: Is the literal interpretation of age calculation in the Bible debated?
A: Yes, there is a debate over whether the ages recorded in the Bible should be understood literally or figuratively.

Q: What is the clans or tribes view of age calculation?
A: Some believe that the names mentioned in the genealogies of Genesis represent clans or tribes rather than individuals, which would explain the long life-spans recorded.

Q: What are the problems with the dynastic view of age calculation?
A: The dynastic view theory of age calculation faces challenges, such as the fact that certain names mentioned in the genealogies do belong to individuals.

Q: Are the age calculations in the Bible to be taken literally?
A: The historic view is that the early humans lived for long periods of time, and there is nothing in Scripture to suggest otherwise.

Q: How was time measured in the Bible?
A: The Bible defines a day as beginning at sunset and going to the next sunset. The week contains seven days, and months are numbered with occasional names mentioned.

Q: What is the cultural and historical context of age calculation in the Bible?
A: The cultural and historical context of age calculation in the Bible is shaped by genealogies, religious practices, and events recorded in biblical history.

Q: What is the conclusion of age calculation in biblical times?
A: Age calculation in biblical times differs from modern methods and is based on genealogies and recorded in years. The debate over literal interpretation continues, but the historic view is that the ages recorded in the Bible are to be understood as literal.

Source Links

• https://www.grapevinestudies.com/blog/how-was-time-measured-in-the-bible/
• https://www.blueletterbible.org/faq/don_stewart/don_stewart_720.cfm
• https://amazingbibletimeline.com/blog/q36_was_a_year_shorter_in_adams_time/