Criteria Academic Integrity Definition
Most successful practices Review UMD Code of Academic Integrity including definitions for academic dishonesty. Reflect on academic integrity and academic dishonesty in context of course design, expectations for students, and disciplinary norms regarding Academic Integrity. Read the yearly OSC Report on Academic Integrity at UMD and assess findings in context of your course and discipline.
Baseline Practices Read UMD Code of Academic Integrity including definitions for academic dishonesty. Be aware of the yearly OSC Report on Academic Integrity at UMD.
Resources• Code of Academic Integrity
Criteria Motives for Students’ Breach of Academic Integrity
Most successful practices Review and reflect upon motivations for academic dishonesty and student perceptions and understanding of the Code, including the impact of cultural differences and sensitivities on students’ perceptions. Common motives for academic dishonesty include: antipathy for professor, it is easy to do, disinterest for subject, neutralizing attitude (cheating does not hurt anyone, low-stakes assignment etc.), perceived social norms (belief that peers cheat and cheaters are not reported), goal of high course grade vs learning, desperation, lack of understanding of assignment expectations and lack of knowledge of the Code.
Baseline Practices Know that there are various motives that lead to academic dishonesty.
ResourcesSources: 1, 2, 12,13, 21, 27, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 48. (See below.)
Criteria Campus Procedures Related to Academic Integrity
Most successful practices Recognize and reflect upon your role in referring a student to the OSC considering the following: The impact of a student referral: Your role in the referral process: The outcome of a referral: Your options to formally support academic integrity processes:
You will contribute to a history on academic conduct for this student and for the campus that may be used to inform future decisions and policies.
For undergraduate students found responsible, the normal sanction is an “XF” grade; however, you may suggest an alternate sanction or provide mitigating circ*mstances through the “recommendation option” in the online referral form
Students, whether found responsible or not, consider a hearing as a serious and solemn event, recidivism is extremely rare
Reporting students suspected of misconduct serves as a disincentive to other students and promotes academic integrity
Postpone posting grades on assignments or exams that are suspect
It is your decision whether or not you inform the student of referral. Once referred, a student will be contacted by OSC
You are expected to complete the online referral form and provide documentation. OSC will evaluate the evidence for reasonable cause
OSC contacts the student for a preliminary meeting
Students may admit responsibility and waive a honor review
Hearings are adjudicated by the Honor Board composed of trained students, faculty, and staff
Students may request a student defender from the Undergraduate Student Legal Aid office
Students may appeal the decision of the Honor Board
Serve on the OSC Honor Board
Serve on the Campus Senate Student Conduct Committee
Act as departmental liaison to OSC
Baseline Practices Be aware of your role, the role of OSC, and the implications to the student in submitting a referral to the Office of Student Conduct for example: You may contact the OSC to discuss your concerns without filing any reports
Referrals and supporting documentation are submitted online to OSC
OSC contacts the student after referral
The normal sanction for undergraduate students found responsible is an “XF” but faculty may recommend an alternate sanction during the referral process
Resources
Office of Student Conduct (OSC) Sources: 32, 34
OSC Faculty Guide
OSC online referral
Role of Attorneys
UMD Legal Aid
Criteria Communicating Importance of Academic Integrity
Most successful practices Announce in class that academic integrity is expected and students who do not uphold the UMD Code of Academic Integrity will be referred to the OSC. Repeatedly promote and model a culture where honesty is expected and enforced. Model academic integrity: e.g. cite sources used for class materials/lectures; acknowledge the importance of respecting an author’s ideas within the context of the author’s discipline. Discuss your strong support for Academic Integrity during class: Communicate expectations for academic integrity:
• Reveal why you support the Code of Academic Integrity indicating your dedication to student learning vs a mission to uncover acts of academic dishonesty
• Indicate where students will find information about the Code and the academic integrity tutorial
• Specifically indicate expectations of the Code highlighting sanctions and consequences for misconduct; e.g. students may be prohibited from participation in university activities
• Relate academic integrity expectations to course discipline, careers, and other real world situations
• Reveal examples of student behaviors and problematic trends in student work related to academic integrity. Note that all assignments (low and high stakes) are subject to academic integrity expectations
• Indicate expectations for academic integrity in relation to the course and specific assignments
• To TAs, provide training using OSC materials or staff as resources
• On exams and assignments, ask students to write out the Honor Pledge statement. Note research finding that making a commitment to academic integrity in writing reinforces practice of academic integrity
• In the syllabus, provide specific expectations of academic integrity for the course and for assignments (low and high stakes) and link to the Code via the Course Related Policy Page
• Before each assignment, remind students of Academic Integrity expectations
Baseline Practices Announce in class that academic integrity is expected and students who do not uphold the UMD Code of Academic Integrity will be referred to the OSC. Place a link to the UGST Course Related Policy Page in the syllabus and indicate in class that this page includes information about expectations for academic integrity. Ask the students to write out and sign the Honor Pledge on exams and other assessments.
Train teaching assistants on expectations and responsibility for academic integrity.
ResourcesCode of Academic Integrity Course related Policy Page Sources: 12, 20, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 39, 48
Office of Student Conduct (OSC)
Request AI presentation
Resources for AI presentation
AI Tutorial
Criteria Course/Assignment Design to Reduce/ Dis-incentivize Fabrication
Most successful practices Indicate your expectations for original work, respect for protection of author’s ideas and professional ethics. Indicate your interest in promoting student learning highlighting the value of doing the work versus fabricating the experience. Design assignments/exams purposefully to reduce fabrication opportunities: Dis-incentivize fabrication of student academic work by reviewing student work carefully, scanning tests for regrade comparison. Dis-incentivize fabrication of documents for excused absences: using the UMD policy for excused absence as a guide; consider the diverse experiences of students and the stress related to illness or circ*mstances beyond the student’s control. Meet with students regarding situations that may affect their academics and allow students opportunities to make up work or complete alternate assignments.
• Require sources and citations
• Focus on process vs one “right answer”
• Require students to show their work or explain their thought process
• Provide opportunities for partial credit
• Require writing of the honor pledge
Baseline Practices Define fabrication and indicate that fabrication is academic dishonesty. Provide clear expectations for student work and for grading. Be aware of trends related to fabrication: lab work results, regrade, documentation of absence. Follow UMD policy for excused absence, give clear policies for make up or late work.
Resourcesn/a
Criteria Course/Assignment Design to Reduce/ Dis-incentivize Academic Dishonesty
Most successful practices Indicate your interest in promoting student learning, defining facilitation in the context of independent and collaborative work. Discuss trends related to facilitation that may lead to academic dishonesty: Indicate that sharing coursework with other students may breach academic integrity. Discriminate publication of original work from sharing of coursework with other students. Discourage students from sharing course materials or work. Clearly indicate expectations for independent vs collaborative work: Provide detailed guidance on aspects of classwork that allow student collaboration. Indicate clearly stages of work where collaboration is expected/required vs not allowed. Lead class discussion or activity on collaboration scenarios to reveal do’s and don’ts. For team projects, follow practices that support individual accountability. Require writing of the honor pledge on all work products.
Baseline Practices Define facilitation and indicate that facilitation is academic dishonesty. Indicate that the copyright of the course materials is owned by the faculty course instructor and may not be shared. Contrast facilitation with collaboration. In the syllabus and assignment instructions indicate when collaborative work is not allowed, when it is allowed, and/or expected.
ResourcesTeamwork Resources Sources: 19, 30, 50
Criteria Course/Assignment Design to Reduce/ De-incentivize Cheating
Most successful practices Define cheating and indicate that cheating is academic dishonesty; stress your interest in promoting student learning, noting the value gained from doing your own work versus cheating Design assignments assuming that prior exams and assignments are available to students: Design assignments /exams purposefully to reduce cheating opportunities: Dis-incentivize cheating:
• Search third-party websites for your course materials. If you find them, protect your copyright by contacting the source requesting removal, and telling your students your course material is copyrighted. Include a copyright statement on your syllabus, assignments, and exams
• Indicate if students may or may not use/share materials from prior versions of the course
Require writing of the honor pledge on all work products.
• Create various versions of assessments (develop and use a question/answer bank)
• Modify assignments each semester
• Require students to show work or explain answer
• Provide assessment feedback to emphasize value of learning from incorrect answers
• Scan exams for use in regrade requests
• Require writing of the honor pledge
• For exams: proctor, verify student identity; e.g. check IDs, complete visual check (assign seats), allow physical space between students (alternate with empty seats)
• Decrease stress by providing being clear and transparent information about testing procedures, schedules and make-up policies
Baseline Practices Define cheating and indicate that cheating is academic dishonesty. Be aware and address the fact that prior exams and assignments are available to students via third party websites and collections maintained by former students. Design assignments /exams to reduce cheating opportunities: Dis-incentivize cheating:
• Create different versions of exam; e.g. randomize question distractors or randomize order of questions, and distribute versions such that adjacent students receive distinct versions (color coding may help)
• For exams: proctor and/or announce that students are expected to uphold the Code. Allow physical space between students (alternate with empty seat), verify student identity; e.g. require sign in, assign seats by section
• Decrease stress by being clear and transparent about testing procedures, schedules and make-up policies
ResourcesUMD Copyright Info Sources: 14, 29, 30, 38
